Presidential vs. Parliamentary Government Essay Example for Free

Presidential vs. Parliamentary Government tasteEvery nation, ever since the dawn of civilization, has always had some form of judicature. It is of necessity rather than need, as a nation without maven will always result to anarchy. Today, two of the most popular and well-kn witness forms of government are the presidential form of government and the parliamentary form of government. Each form of government has its own pros and cons, and the debate of whether one is better than the other has long been a subject of discussion. The main difference surrounded by the two forms of government is how the extent governmental powers are distributed and/or separated between weapon brasses of the government, and whether one branch has or does not have power over another. In the presidential form of government, governmental and administrative powers are distinctly divided between the executive branch (the President), the legislative branch (i.e., the congress/senate), and the judicatu re branch.The powers vested in the executive branch is usually dimensiond against those given to the legislative assembly. Laws and bills are made by the legislative assembly and it is the executive branch which enacts it. The President has the power to veto the bill, preventing its execution, but the legislature may override the Presidents veto, provided they spate gather enough votes to do so (Parliamentary versus Presidential governments). This serves as a check and balance for both branches, ensuring that one does not overpower the other. In the parliamentary form of government, however, there is a coalescency of power between the legislative and executive branch. This is mostly due to the fact that the head of government, the Prime Minister, is voted into smear by the legislature, which is often mostly composed of the ruling troupe or coalition. Hence, almost always, the constituents of the executive and the legislature branches are the same (Governing Systems and Executiv e-Legislative Relations). The terms of office for both heads of the government also varies. In the presidential system of government, the President serves a specific, defined term. In the parliamentary system, the Prime Minister rest in power for as long as he or she has the support of the majority of the legislation. governmental parties also hold less of an impact on the presidential system than on then parliamentary system since the President can still be voted in office regardless of whether his or her political party is a minority or not. In parliamentary system, its almost always the ruling party which holds dominance over the outcome of the election of head of government. Given the choice, from the points stated, I would rather be a citizen of a country ruled by a parliamentary government, like the United Kingdom. There is more(prenominal) cohesion and unity given the fact that the legislative and the executive powers come from one ruling, common party. This would suppose that bills are passed much quicker. Also, ethnicity, race, and ideology wont be much of a conflicting factor, especially for a very diverse country, since power is equally divided amongst the legislators, and not just focused on one (e.g. the President). Lastly, a study conducted by the World Bank has found out that a parliamentary system is associated with lower corruption (Lederman, Loayza, Soares, par. 1).Works CitedGoverning Systems and Executive-Legislative Relations. UNDP Governance Political systems and their impact on Governing Relations. 2006. 18 declination 2007. http//www.undp.org/governance/docs/Parl-Pub-govern.htmLederman, Daniel and Normal Loayza and Rodrigo R. Soares. Accountability and Corruption Political Institutions Matter. World Bank Policy query Working Paper No. 2708. 2001. 18 December 2007. http//ssrn.com/abstract=632777Parliamentary Versus Presidential Governments. eSSORTMENT. 2002. 18 December 2007. http//mi.essortment.com/presidentialpar_rket.htm