Saturday, April 13, 2019

Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton 1783-1800 Essay Example for Free

Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton 1783-1800 EssayThe post-revolutionary warfare period of the Unites States saw the establishment of the first hostel system and an enlarging gap in viewpoints between the wealthy and the joint man. One might argue that a political party develops in response to a series of controversial issues yet to a neat extent the contradictory views of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson over issues related to views of regime, the role of government and social school of thought in foreign and domestic affairs, were primarily responsible for shaping the maturate of political parties from 1783-1800. Originally feared by the forefathers, the rise of political parties emerged from intense ideological struggles over views of government between two political leadership important to President Washingtons Cabinet, Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury and Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State. Alexander Hamilton exerted the most influence within the newly emerging Federalist Party. He believed that only an educated ruling class could produce a strong, stable and effective federal government. The government therefore mandatory the support of wealthy men and the promotion of manufacturing interests. Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans defended more the rights of the common man and an agricultural society with limited power from the federal government. His basic principle was grounded in a belief that the people had a more honest and disinterested influence in politics than the wealthy. The Republican Party attracted more of the common people while the Federalist Party drew support from the aristocracy.Although neither side was willing to admit to it, these institutions were cognise as the first party system. Both parties stance on who should have more power in the government contributed to the mostly diverse views of the common man and the wealthy man. Hamilton and Jeffersons differences in social doctrine over the reading material of the administration and the establishment of a national bank further strengthened the rise of established political parties. Federalists called for the national debt to be funded and hoped to create a large national bank assign by wealthy men. Hamilton defended it in a plan presented to Congress by claiming the general nature of the Constitution allowed for corporations to assist in carrying forth by all means infallible that which is take to carry out the duties of government. If permitted, this vein of reasoning presented a broad interpretation of the Constitution, one that relied upon the elastic clause to justify that which is considerednecessary and proper. Jefferson and the Republicans felt the bank was unconstitutional and his opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank (1791) required a strict or literal interpretation that drew upon a philosophy of government that verbalise powers not delegated belonged, or better, are reserved, for the people and the states. This included the incorporation of a bank which is not a delegated power given to government in the Constitution.Hamiltons rebuttal can be seen in a letter to George Washington that argued for a broad interpretation of the Constitution on the grounds that it gave to the government delegated and implied powers. In essence, all powers deemed necessary and proper for the fulfillment of delegated duties are constitutional, like the incorporation of a bank. This became known as the elastic clause and would be applied in later debates over constitutional interpretation. Both parties chemical reaction to the Constitutionality of a national bank show their contrasting beliefs in how the Constitution was to be understand. Proving to be a major point of contention between the developing sides, Federalists also called for an chafe revenue to be placed on distillers of alcohol. The whisky Rebellion was the inevitable consequence of the enactment of this tax. Hamilton argued in his efforts to suppress the Whiskey Boys that the people, in ratifying the Constitution, had given the primaeval government the power to tax for the purpose of paying off debts and providing for the nations defense. Since the Constitution had not been amended contrary to those powers Hamilton believed that President Washington had been justified in levying the tax and the Whiskey Rebellion was therefore an unjustified rebellion that needed to be put down by the central government.The Republicans, highly suspicious of taxation as the American colonists had once been, did not believe the excise tax to be constitutional and celebrated the Whiskey Rebellion as an act of protecting rights against an abusive government action. The people had to be the safeguard of the new Republic. The Federalist political cartoon Mad Tom in a Rage portrayed Thomas Jefferson as a liquor soaked anarchist aided by the devil in order to bring the government down. The reactions to the Whiskey Rebe llion reflect how the Federalists and Republicans differed in their interpretation of the Constitution. In social philosophy, the two politicians articulated their partys disagreement over foreign insurance policy concerns regarding the revolution in France. When the french transmutation grew to its most radical peak the Federalists reacted with horror as citizens overthrew the aristocracy. In launching the New Ship of State Hamilton said he did not see the French Revolution as comparable to the American Revolution and doubted if a bleak and good government was likely to end from the war in France. Thomas Jeffersons response was to stress the potential outcome of the Revolution, how it would benefit the self-coloured of mankind, meaning the common man, and how this result could only be won with the spilling of blood, thereby justifying the excesses of violence in the attain of republicanism. Many Republicans even imitated French Jacobins in dress and in speaking.As tension in europium grew Federalists favored an alliance with Great Britain while Republicans generally favored a greater alliance to the French. Jays Treaty was generally seen as a Hamiltonian move to increase the likelihood of a political descent with Britain over one with France. The difference between the Federalist and Republican social philosophies regarding foreign relations is most easily seen among Hamilton and Jeffersons different reactions to the French Revolution. When the Federalists tried to silence the Republican opposition the result was the vastly unpopular Alien and rebellion Acts passed under the Federalist presidency of John Adams. The Alien Act ordered all foreigners considered precarious to leave the unify States. As a result many Republicans found much of its support grew within the nation. The Sedition Act Read That if any person shall write, print, utter, or publish.scandalous and malicious writings against the government of the United Statessuch person shall be punished. The Sedition Act convicted ten men most of whom were Republicans news editors criticizing the Federal government. The Republicans interpreted these laws as an attempt to destroy them and violate the principles of free speech. They fought back with the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. The Virginia Resolution pointed out how the Acts violated the rights of free speech protected in the Constitution.Jeffersons Kentucky Resolution argued the states compact (or states right) theory that acts by the central government could be nullified by the sovereign states if deemed unconstitutional as the Resolution so deemed the Alien and Sedition Acts. The resolutions nullified the laws and contributed to the rise of Republicanism and the fall of Federalism. The controversial issue contributed largely to the Federalist partys defeat inthe presidential election of 1800. The differing opinions on how the government in the post-Revolutionary war period should be run ultimately created the f irst rise in political parties. The Federalist belief in a government run by wealthy men and opposing Republican support for an agrarian society split the nations people in support of a government most beneficial to them. Differing reactions to the French Revolution showed the distinct difference in Federalist and Republican over foreign policy. The National Bank and the excise tax on liquor revealed differing views on how strictly the Constitution should be interpreted and the Alien and Sedition Acts reveal an attempt of one party to dissolve another. The contrasting views of Hamiltons Federalism and Jeffersons Republicanism were the ultimate contributors to ripping the nation on views of government and establishing the first political parties.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.